Wednesday, 30 January 2013

Nursery changes 'to raise quality'

29 January 2013 Last updated at 18:20 GMT Nursery class The government says mandatory staff ratios are tighter in England than in much of Europe Nurseries and childminders in England are to be allowed to look after more children, in a package ministers say will improve quality and cut costs.

The ratio of children to carers can be raised, but only if carers' qualifications meet new standards.

Children's Minister Liz Truss said the proposals would make more childcare places available and reduce costs for parents in the "long term".

Critics warn the change in ratios could actually compromise quality of care.

They also predict the changes - which are due to come into force in the autumn - will be unpopular with parents and are unlikely to reduce the overall costs of childcare.

Continue reading the main story CURRENTUnder one and one-year-olds - 1:3Two-year-olds - 1:4Three-year-olds and above - 1:8 or 1:13 (teacher-led)PROPOSEDUnder one and one-year-olds 1:4Two-year-olds - 1:6Three-year-olds and above - 1:8 or 1:13 (teacher-led)Statutory ratios for carers per child vary depending on age and setting. Ratios for two-year-olds are set to rise from four children per adult to six children per adult, and for ones-and-under to rise from three children per adult to four children per adult.

Ratios for three-year-olds and over would remain at eight or 13 children per adult, depending on whether a qualified graduate was present.

Ms Truss says the changes will bring the UK in line with countries such as France and Sweden. England's higher ratios lead to higher costs for parents and lower pay for staff, she says.

Ms Truss told the BBC the proposals were about raising standards and only those nurseries that hired staff with higher qualifications would be able to take on more children.

"It will make it higher quality, more available and more affordable. It will take time to recruit new people and expand nurseries. In the long term it will be more affordable," she said.

Liz Truss: "We're raising the standards so that parents will be able to get more available nursery places."

Britain has some of the highest childcare costs in the world, with many mothers with two or more children saying it does not make financial sense to work.

An earlier report by Ms Truss suggested the average family spends 27% of their income on childcare.

Ms Truss said childcare professionals should be better qualified in the UK.

Continue reading the main story
Research also overwhelmingly indicates that introducing young children to quasi-formal academic learning too young has lifelong negative consequences”

End Quote Richard House Early Childhood Action Campaign founder "When parents hand their child over to the care of a childminder or nursery, they are not just entrusting them with their child's physical safety, they are also entrusting their child's brain," she said

"With this in mind, it is no longer acceptable that childcare professionals are not required to have a GCSE grade C or above in English and maths."

This will apply to new nursery staff only, however.

'Very difficult'

Shadow education secretary Stephen Twigg said the plans to increase the ratios would undermine the quality of childcare in the UK.

Stephen Twigg: "Saying that more children will be in each setting risks undermining quality and even risks undermining safety."

"I think this is one area where we've actually got something to teach other countries.

"If you look at France, there's actually quite a big public debate about whether they've got this right. I don't think you can compare the situation with Sweden where they have very, very generous parental leave so very few young babies are in these sorts of settings."

Kent-based nursery manager Josie Lait is sceptical about the plans, saying fewer adults would jeopardise the quality of care and the safety of children.

"I feel it isn't realistic to change the ratios because the quality will go down dramatically.

"And if you have people who are better qualified, costs will go up, so how will parents benefit?

"I wouldn't want to enforce it [new ratios] myself, I wouldn't want my setting to change."

Anand Shukla, from national childcare charity Daycare Trust, said: "No matter how well qualified the members of staff, there are practical considerations when you increase the number of children that they have to look after," he said.

"For one person to look after six two-year-olds, for one person to talk to six two-year-olds, to help their language development, we think is going to be very difficult."

National Day Nurseries Association chief executive Purnima Tanuku welcomed the commitment made by the government to improve childcare but said the "quality of childcare and early education must not be sacrificed".

She said: "Many parents do not want an increase in the number of children nursery staff are allowed look after. They are worried it will have a negative impact on the individual attention and care their child receives."

Anne Longfield, chief executive of children's charity and nursery provider 4Children, said: "The welfare of the child must be our first concern throughout, but with highly qualified early-years teachers and a better inspection regime, there is an opportunity to review current arrangements and provide simpler information for parents and better incentives for providers to concentrate on what matters - children."

In Wales, the maximum number of children a child minder can care is six children under eight years of age. Of those six children, no more than three may be under five years of and of those three children, normally no more than two may be under 18 months of age.

In Welsh nurseries, there should be one adult to three children under two years, one adult to four children aged two years and one adult to eight children aged three to seven years.

Ratios of children to childcare professionals

Source: OECD * Allows teams of carers to look after extra children as part of a group


View the original article here

VIDEO: Nursery staff a 'two-tier system'

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.


View the original article here

Councils could lose adoption powers

24 January 2013 Last updated at 10:13 GMT Family walking through trees The government believes adoption waits in some cases are unacceptable Councils in England could lose their powers over adoption services if they take too long to find adoptive parents, ministers have announced.

The government said it was a last chance for local authorities to show they could recruit the adopters needed.

Otherwise, new laws would require them to outsource adoption services.

Ministers say they are "determined to address a situation where adopters are coming forward to adopt and are being told they are not wanted".

'Futures in balance'

"Currently there are significant weaknesses in the way local authorities bring in more adopters. The government is not prepared to see these children miss out because the adoption recruitment system is failing," they added.

According to official figures, there were 4,600 children waiting to be adopted in England in March 2012.

Some 600 extra adopters a year were needed to cope with demand, as well as another 3,000 to deal with a backlog.

The move over adoption powers is being unveiled by Children and Families Minister Edward Timpson.

He said: "There are over 4,000 children waiting to be adopted nationally, but year on year local authorities are not recruiting enough people to give them stable and loving homes. We cannot stand by whilst children's futures hang in the balance.

"Some local authorities are already doing a good job to recruit the adopters they need in their area - but not enough is being done to address the national shortage."

'Up to challenge'

He added: "We have set out our vision of how we expect local authorities, together with voluntary adoption agencies, to respond to the needs of all children waiting for adoption.

"Local authorities must now demonstrate that they are up to the challenge, or we won't hesitate to intervene."

Chairman of the Local Government Association's children and young people board, David Simmonds, said figures show councils had twice the rate of success of independent adoption agencies and removing them from the process should only be considered as a very last resort.

"We are already looking introduce a series of measures to increase the number of adopters in the system, including looking at how councils can improve the way they work together to more widely match potential adopters with children in different parts of the country, specifically in areas where there is an acute shortage of adopters," he said.

"Councils are getting on with their part of the job by approving more children for adoption, with 12% more children adopted in 2012 than 2011, the highest figure since 2007. Government now needs to play its part by finally reducing the heavy legal burden of care proceedings and ridiculous bureaucracy which causes huge delays that can put some people off adopting altogether."

The Department for Education said long-term structural reforms would take time and so it would return £150m to councils to help tackle pressing needs in adoption services.

It will also award the Consortium of Voluntary Adoption Agencies a grant of £1 million to enable Voluntary Adoption Agencies to recruit more adopters.

Latest figures show children are left in care for an average of 21 months before being adopted.

In some areas, they have to wait up to three years before the process is completed.


View the original article here