Gordon Brown accuses News International - The Independent

Former prime minister Gordon Brown accused News International newspapers today of accessing private information about himself and his family.

He said he and his wife were "in tears" after being told by the Sun that it was going to publish a story about their son's cystic fibrosis.

And he told the BBC: "I think that what happened pretty early on in government is that the Sunday Times appear to have got access to my building society account, they got access to my legal files, there is some question mark about what happened to other files - documentation, tax and everything else."

He went on: "I just can't understand this - if I, with all the protection and all the defences and all the security that a chancellor of the Exchequer or a prime minister, am so vulnerable to unscrupulous tactics, to unlawful tactics, methods that have been used in the way we have found, what about the ordinary citizen?

"What about the person, like the family of Milly Dowler, who are in the most desperate of circumstances, the most difficult occasions in their lives, in huge grief and then they find that they are totally defenceless in this moment of greatest grief from people who are employing these ruthless tactics with links to known criminals."

Mr Brown said he could not think of any legitimate means by which the Sun could have got hold of details of his four-month-old son Fraser's cystic fibrosis in 2006.

"They will have to explain themselves," he told the BBC. "I can't think of any way that the medical condition of a child can be put into the public arena legitimately unless the doctor makes a statement or the family makes a statement.

"I make no claims, but the fact of the matter is that I had my bank accounts broken into, I had my lawyers' files effectively blagged, my tax returns went missing at one point.

"I don't know how all this happened, but I do know one thing: that in two of those instances there is absolute proof that News International was involved in hiring people to get this information."

News International sources were quoted last night as saying they were "comfortable" that stories reported by the Sun about Mr Brown's children were obtained via legitimate means.

In a statement, News International said it noted the allegations about Mr Brown, adding: "So that we can investigate these matters further, we ask that all information concerning these allegations is provided to us."

But Mr Brown's broadside ensured that the hacking story remained firmly in the spotlight.

He spoke out as one of Britain's top policemen, Metropolitan Police assistant commissioner John Yates, told the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee that the News of the World "failed to co-operate" with police inquiries into phone hacking until the start of this year.

Mr Yates, the Met's head of counter-terrorism, also expressed regret at his 2009 ruling that there was no need to reopen the phone-hacking investigation and he said he was "99% certain" his phone had been hacked.

Mr Brown said he tried to secure a judicial inquiry into the conduct of News International while he was in power, but faced resistance from the police, Home Office and Cabinet Office.

He accused the company of seeking to abuse its power for political gain over issues such as the future of the BBC and the "neutering" of broadcasting regulator Ofcom, but insisted that as prime minister he had resisted it.

And he added: "Of course, the abuse of their power for political gain is something that is going to have to be looked at. Any inquiry that is going to be set up is going to have to look at how News International attempted to abuse political power for political gain."

Speaking during a visit to Wales, Prime Minister David Cameron said Mr Brown's claims were "yet another example of an appalling invasion of privacy".

"My heart goes out to Gordon and Sarah Brown because to have your children's privacy invaded in that way - and I know that myself particularly - when your child isn't well, is completely unacceptable and heart-breaking for the family concerned," Mr Cameron said.

He insisted that the police would "find the culprits and make sure they are punished", while the promised judge-led inquiry would find out "what was going on at these newspapers".

"This Government won't rest until we have got to the bottom of what is clearly an appalling mess," he said.

Mr Yates faced difficult questioning by MPs, insisting he had always told the truth to the Home Affairs Select Committee.

He said: "I can assure you all that I have never lied and all the information that I've provided to this committee has been given in good faith.

"It is a matter of great concern that, for whatever reason, the News of the World appears to have failed to co-operate in the way that we now know they should have with the relevant police inquiries up until January of this year.

"They have only recently supplied information and evidence that would clearly have had a significant impact on the decisions that I took in 2009 had it been provided to us."

Mr Yates also strongly denied allegations in the New York Times that he was put under pressure not to investigate phone hacking at the News of the World because of fears that the Sunday tabloid would publish details about his personal life.

"I categorically state that was not the case to each and every one of you. I think it's despicable, I think it's cowardly," he told the MPs.

Mr Yates said he had "never, ever, ever" received payment from journalists for information but admitted it was "highly probable" that some of his officers did.

Asked by committee chairman Keith Vaz whether he had offered to stand down from his job, the senior officer said: "No, I haven't offered to resign.

"And if you're suggesting that I should resign for what News of the World has done and my very small part in it, I think that's probably unfair."

Labour MP Mr Vaz told Mr Yates at the end of the session that the committee found his evidence "unconvincing".

He told him: "There are more questions to be asked about what happened when you conducted this review.

"So you may well be hearing from us again. Please do not regard this as an end of the matter."

View the original article here

Nick Clegg: 'The pillars of the establishment are tumbling' - The Independent

The Deputy Prime Minster tells Andrew Grice why the crisis enveloping the Murdoch empire is an opportunity for the Liberal Democrats

It is 6am and Nick Clegg has had a largely wakeful night thanks to his two-year-old son Miguel, a sleep resister. But he surprises his bleary-eyed aides as they head for a Eurostar train to Paris with a neat insight into the phone-hacking crisis.

"The pillars of the British establishment are tumbling one after the other," he says. He points out that the casualties could be viewed on a trip down the River Thames – News International at Wapping (hacking); the banks in the City (the financial crisis); Parliament (MPs' expenses) and nearby Scotland Yard (hacking).

The deputy prime minister senses a rare opportunity in the hacking scandal to carve out a separate niche. The Liberal Democrats have never wooed or been wooed by the media moguls. Unlike David Cameron and Ed Miliband, Mr Clegg did not attend Rupert Murdoch's annual summer party in London last month. He has twice been through the mincer of the ruthless Tory-supporting press machine – during the "Cleggmania" of last year's election and the ill-fated alternative-vote referendum in May.

On the 6.52am train from London St Pancras last Friday, Mr Clegg speaks with passion: "You have politicians falling to their knees ingratiating themselves with media moguls. You have too many vested interests tied up with each other. You have a culture of arrogance and impunity"

He was quick out of the traps last week, pressing Mr Cameron successfully for the public inquiry covering the police and the press to be headed by a judge. Mr Clegg believes the crisis offers an opportunity to clean up Britain's "rotten establishment". To reflect liberal values, of course. "The anger people feel is almost palpable. The question is how we harness that sense of outrage to build something better for the future."

Although the Press Complaints Commission is a "busted flush", he does not favour statutory regulation, which might give politicians "free rein" to shackle the newspapers. "I believe in a raucous, loud, free press."

The controversy offers Mr Clegg a welcome diversion from his party's own woes. For once, it is Mr Cameron's turn to feel the heat. But Mr Clegg knows he will not escape it for long. After a rout in May's local elections, the AV referendum and the continuing cloud of university tuition fees, Liberal Democrat activists are anxious. The voices who believe the party made a catastrophic mistake by getting into bed with the Conservatives will get louder at the party's conference in September.

"It has been really, really tough for us, this first year," Mr Clegg admits. He concedes the Liberal Democrats have taken the hit for the Coalition's unpopular policies. "Cutting public spending is something you expect from Conservative governments... There is no doubt that embarking on such a painful deficit-reduction plan was always going to be politically controversial for a party such as the Liberal Democrats."

The bad news for his critics, who fear a Liberal Democrat massacre at the next election, is that Mr Clegg is "even more persuaded today than last year" that the party made the right call by entering the Coalition.

The good news is that he is utterly convinced his party will get the credit before the next election. While he would like to reap the dividend in 2012, he admits it might take longer for far-reaching reforms to sink in and for the economy to recover fully. He believes the reforms have been "obscured" by fear of the spending cuts.

"We are condemned to govern for the long term. I look forward to us moving into a much more positive frame of mind in the years ahead.

"By 2015 we will be able to show people we have put the building blocks in place on tax, education, the early years, apprenticeships, vocational education and greater social mobility in a way that the Conservatives would never have done on their own and, at the same time, we have put the economy back on course. "

He reveals his party's new unique selling point is "compassion and competence", adding: "I don't think they fit on a leaflet... We need two shorter words." He insists: "I think the long term is really, really bright. There is a huge appetite in British politics for a party that is economically more competent than Labour and which is more progressive than the Conservatives. Only the Liberal Democrats fit that bill."

The atmosphere in the Coalition has changed since Mr Cameron allowed the Tories to launch personal attacks on Mr Clegg during the AV referendum. Yet the Liberal Democrat leader plays down the new mood. "This is not a coalition driven by sentiment but by a belief that it is right for the country for two parties to govern together in the national interest.

"It was always much more business-like than people were keen to suggest. The Coalition has settled down to what it is – two different parties with two different views on Europe, the NHS and other issues. Mostly in private, sometimes in public, we try to resolve those differences and do the right thing for the country. Of course that requires the two people at the top to be able to work with each other in a spirit of mutual respect and in a business-like manner."

But surely those personal attacks must have hurt? "You have got to be pretty resilient in politics. You also need to expect in a coalition that you go through bumps and scrapes. I don't believe you throw your teddy out of the pram... I don't feel frustrated; I just push on." In the new phase, he is more honest about the disagreements. Does he support the Prime Minister's flagship Big Society theme? "It is not my phrase, it is David Cameron's," he replies. "I talk much more about an open society."

After a whistle-stop eight-hour visit to Paris, Mr Clegg also speaks candidly about his differences with the prime minister over Europe. "We come at it from completely different directions. That doesn't mean we can't govern together," he explains on the return journey.

The former MEP is passionate about the EU, convinced that a positive approach is "a vital national self-interest". He explains: "We have got to continue to play our part to shape the European Union, not seek every opportunity to somehow distance ourselves from it." The Liberal Democrats, he says, as an internationalist party, are "a very important force in the British government". He confirms they have put the brakes on a more Eurosceptic government agenda and is proud of it. "There are views in the Conservative Party about Europe which I strongly disagree with. They can implement them when they are a Conservative-only government, but they can't when they are in coalition. Quite frankly there are [other] things on Europe that I would do. We don't agree on this."

In Paris, Mr Clegg has a packed agenda and is somehow snaked through heavy traffic in a high-speed police escort.

His foreign affairs role is one the public do not see. At present, he and Mr Cameron spend more time talking about Libya than anything else. Then there is Mr Clegg's day job: driving through an ambitious programme of political and constitutional reform, chairing the Cabinet's pivotal domestic affairs committee and resolving disputes between the two Coalition parties with Mr Cameron.

Mr Clegg, who speaks in Spanish to his wife Miriam and in Dutch to his mother, is at ease as he conducts most of his Paris meetings in French which is judged "better than Tony Blair's" by impressed officials. Mr Clegg meets François Barin, the French Finance Minister, then delivers a long speech in French to business leaders.

He has a private one-to-one lunch with François Fillon, the prime minister; answers questions at "town hall" meeting staged by the British Council; hosts a reception for defence staff at the British ambassador's residence before squeezing in interviews with the French media. It's not for show; behind the scenes, some serious business is discussed about the ever-closer Anglo-French co-operation on defence.

He doesn't entirely escape domestic matters. French journalists press him on whether the hacking scandal will damage the Coalition and a student asks whether breaking the Liberal Democrat manifesto promise on tuition fees will result in a "brain drain". He must be exhausted by the end of his long day, but his optimism is still bright. "We took a big hit in May. I don't diminish that. But the idea that the end is nigh is far from the truth."

Nor is his own end in sight, despite rumours in Liberal Democrat circles that he might judge it in the party's interests for someone else to lead it into the next election if he were too tainted by the Coalition. He is surprised when I raise the speculation, but I warn him it is bound to grow. "I am certainly going to lead the party into the general election," he insists, dismissing the rumours as "chitter chatter about what might happen in four years" and "crystal-ball gazing taking a slightly surreal turn".

Does the carping ever make him feel like giving up front-line politics to spend more time with his family? "Of course I would like to spend more time with Miriam and the kids. But no, I genuinely don't think that. I am unbelievably lucky, unbelievably privileged. In my time in government, I just want to make the best of it. I also want to be able to look back on it and say at every turn, 'I tried to do the right thing'. That is immensely important to me personally and really important for my party."

Life in brief

* Nick Clegg was born on 7 January 1967 in Chalfont St Giles, Buckinghamshire, and educated at Westminster School.

* He studied social anthropology at Cambridge University, political philosophy at Minnesota University and completed an MA in European affairs at the College of Europe.

* Between 1992 and 1995, he worked as a journalist before becoming a consultant and moving to Budapest to write about economic reform.

* In 1995, he was employed by the European Commission and worked as chief of staff to Sir Leon Brittan.

* He was elected MEP for the East Midlands in 1999, later acting as the Liberal Democrat spokesman on trade and industry.

* In 2005, he was elected as MP for Sheffield Hallam, becoming Europe spokesman in Charles Kennedy's team, and later the party's spokesman on home affairs.

* He was elected leader of the Lib Dems in 2007 and became deputy prime minister in 2010.

* He is married to Miriam, a lawyer, and has three sons.

View the original article here